<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AMD on GrevireBlog</title><link>https://blog.grevire.dev/en/tags/amd/</link><description>Recent content in AMD on GrevireBlog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 15:24:22 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.grevire.dev/en/tags/amd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>My Local AI Cost 10.72× Less Than the API — Until I Recomputed It Properly</title><link>https://blog.grevire.dev/en/posts/local-ai-cost/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://blog.grevire.dev/en/posts/local-ai-cost/</guid><description>Drafted with Mimo v2.5 and corrected by Deepseek V4.1
Correction (2026-10-26). The first version of this article claimed local inference was 10.72× cheaper than the equivalent API. That figure was wrong: I priced every input token at the fresh rate, ignoring cached input, which is billed at roughly a tenth of it and accounts for most of an agent workload. Recomputed properly, the gap is about 2×, not 10.72× — and once you amortize the GPU it disappears entirely.</description></item></channel></rss>